On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:12:47AM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote: > Yes, I agree that more rigorous and agreed definitions would be > helpful. It also takes time, and impedes innovation, so I'm not sure > if we're quite mature enough to "nail down" QML just yet. Should be > soon though, in the next few years.
To get this straight: After five years of development the "Maintainer" of the Qt Declarative module is neither able nor willing to give a simple definition of what "QML" is. _This_ explains a lot. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
