After 10 years, time to refactor to organize the stack. md
On 4/28/2014 6:02 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em seg 28 abr 2014, às 23:34:21, André Pönitz escreveu: >> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:12:47AM -0700, Alan Alpert wrote: >>> Yes, I agree that more rigorous and agreed definitions would be >>> helpful. It also takes time, and impedes innovation, so I'm not sure >>> if we're quite mature enough to "nail down" QML just yet. Should be >>> soon though, in the next few years. >> >> To get this straight: After five years of development the "Maintainer" of >> the Qt Declarative module is neither able nor willing to give a simple >> definition of what "QML" is. > > I can't also explain very well what QtCore is and it has existed for 10 years > now. > > It's the low-level interface to the OS and basic and tool classes, plus a > part > of the XML support, but not all of it. And the item models. And the state > machine. Oh, and a few more tidbits that ended up in QtCore because they are > not really graphical in nature. > > So is QtCore the kitchen sink? > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
