On Monday, May 26, 2014 21:30:01 Sergio Ahumada wrote: > El 26/05/14 20:54, Stephen Kelly escribió: > > Hello, > > > > This tweet was brought to my attention: > > https://twitter.com/Korchkidu/status/470850176366968832 > > > > and it is true that the cmake files generated contain the incorrect > > filename, compared to the actual files shipped. > > > > The Enginio files are called something like > > > > libEnginio.so.1.0.5 > > > > instead of something like > > > > libQt5Enginio.so.5.x.y > > you could probably check the comments in > https://codereview.qt-project.org/83748 to get an idea about the naming.
Thanks, so it's deliberate. The above differences in the naming convention seem needless. The module could be versioned independently without that inconsistency in the filenames. The library filenames for Enginio do not have a version in their basename at all, as was discussed and actioned for all modules before Qt 5.0. Is that a mistake, or is this stuff a free-for-all for all new modules? Thanks, -- Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
