On Wednesday, June 04, 2014 13:48:30 Stephen Kelly wrote: > So, I think all that is needed is to decide whether it is a mistake which > should be fixed, and if so, should it be fixed as I suggested with a new > major version of Enginio.
We decided on IRC that this should be fixed. How exactly that will be done remains to be seen. https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-39506 If it turns out that a new major version is not an option for BC or SC reasons, then that would contradict the claim that 'extra' Qt modules may have disparate version schemes. In that case we would need to decide that is *not* allowed for extra modules to have SC or BC breaking releases, even if they use a disparate version scheme. Thanks, -- Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
