On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:14:34PM +0000, Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) wrote: > I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: QQSM > this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something isolated, when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing features of qml/quick? you should aim at bringing this into the qtdeclarative repository, possibly directly into one of the existing modules. all the "sandboxing" you need is the review (series) you will create on gerrit anyway.
if you just want a public repo for sharing for the time being, you can use a clone on gitorious or github, or you could use our own personal namespaces per http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-February/009919.html > I'd like to officially request a sandbox for: Replicant > sounds ok to me, though i wonder whether naming the technology as a whole "replicant" is such a good idea, given the strong connotation with android. maybe something more "task-oriented" like QtRpc would be a better idea. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
