Oswald wrote: > this sounds wrong to me. why would you need a "sandbox", i.e., something > isolated, > when it's pretty clear that this is one of the key missing features of > qml/quick? you > should aim at bringing this into the qtdeclarative repository, possibly > directly into one > of the existing modules. all the "sandboxing" you need is the review (series) > you will > create on gerrit anyway.
This works for me. From a code perspective, this isn't really a stretch. And it probably doesn't require much maintenance. I originally proposed a QtCS session for this, but I think instead I will try to talk to the QML maintainers outside of a session. If any said maintainers think it is worth a full session, please let me know. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
