On 04 Aug 2014, at 21:38, Adam Strzelecki <o...@java.pl> wrote: >> Before you do that, can you write up a proposal on what you want to >> accomplish and how to get there? > > WHAT I WANT TO ACCOMPLISH > > (1) Remove need to rewrite Qt libraries (frameworks) headers during install > and during macdeployqt > (2) This makes possible to check whether libraries came from official SDK > (i.e. md5 sums) > (3) Won't invalidate frameworks signatures when changing their binary contents > (4) Make SDK relocable, so it can be moved around w/o need to reinstall, also > making drag&drop SDK installer possible for Mac >
Thanks! I think separating introducing @rpath and any workflow changes makes sense. The proposed macdeployqt changes looks good to me. My main concern is timing and the 5.4 feature freeze, especially for the SDK/installer-framework parts. Is it already to late? Morten _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development