On 2014-08-06, at 03:50 PM, Sorvig Morten <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On 04 Aug 2014, at 21:38, Adam Strzelecki <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Before you do that, can you write up a proposal on what you want to >>> accomplish and how to get there? >> >> WHAT I WANT TO ACCOMPLISH >> >> (1) Remove need to rewrite Qt libraries (frameworks) headers during install >> and during macdeployqt >> (2) This makes possible to check whether libraries came from official SDK >> (i.e. md5 sums) >> (3) Won't invalidate frameworks signatures when changing their binary >> contents >> (4) Make SDK relocable, so it can be moved around w/o need to reinstall, >> also making drag&drop SDK installer possible for Mac >> > > Thanks! I think separating introducing @rpath and any workflow changes makes > sense. The proposed macdeployqt changes looks good to me. > > My main concern is timing and the 5.4 feature freeze, especially for the > SDK/installer-framework parts. Is it already to late? Absolutely. Such a big change should wait for 5.5; we don't want any major issues introduced right before release time. :) > Morten > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Jake Petroules - jake.petroules at petroules.com Chief Technology Officer - Petroules Corporation _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
