On Tuesday 24 March 2015 13:38:54 Matthew Woehlke wrote: > Option 2: Use the highest available language level support. The drawback > is that if your compiler supports C++xy, Qt will be built in C++xy mode > *with no way to force a different mode*. > > > Thiago is proposing Option 2. In particular, the emphasized drawback; > what is being removed is the ability to *prevent* Qt from enabling C++11 > / C++14 mode if the compiler supports such a mode. It does *not* mean > that Qt as a whole will require C++14. I think where the confusion is > occurring is that there is an implicit "where supported by the compiler" > in "enabled by default". C++11 / C++14 will be enabled (by default / > unconditionally) *on compilers that support those modes*. We're not > talking about dropping support for pre-C++11/14 compilers, just dropping > the ability to not make use of the same if it is present. > > Hopefully that helps clear things up...
Thanks Matthew, that's what I meant. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
