On Tuesday 24 March 2015 20:20:46 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > > And all for what? What do people gain by passing -no-c++11 today? > > they can (at least hypothetically) test their stuff with older language > versions without installing a second compiler (and forcing qt to use it, > which is a royal pita).
They who? Do you mean "we", as in developers of Qt itself? Is this really required or should people edit the mkspec? Aside from an option for the CI to test non- C++11, why do we need it? If you mean any other group of people, I don't see how they're relevant. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
