On Thursday 09 April 2015 13:04:21 André Somers wrote: > I think it is reasonable to remove such indirect includes if they are > not needed for Qt itself. However, it is worth looking into how the > thing was documented to begin with. In the case of qHash(), the > documentation for that one actualy says the include is <QHash>. I think > it is not reasonable to break that.
I agree, and therefore the change(s) in question does't/don't. -- Marc Mutz <[email protected]> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
