On 14/04/15 08:36, "Mathias Hasselmann" <[email protected]> wrote: >Am 10.04.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Thiago Macieira: >> On Friday 10 April 2015 15:03:04 André Somers wrote: >>> I do think it needs a bit of work on the documentation side of things >>>to >>> make it clear that really any QList<QByteArray> now behaves as/is a >>> QByteArrayList. The documentation still says it is a class. >> >> For documentation purposes only. >> >Is lying to the user really the proper approach for documentation? I'd >totally prefer if the documentation tells the user that special methods >are available for QList specializations.
Agree. Currently I believe qdoc can’t handle template specializations properly though. So we’ll need to fix that part first. In the meantime, we could add a sentence inside the QByteArrayList docs saying that it’s in reality a typedef. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
