On Thursday 11 June 2015 13:09:39 Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Marc Mutz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I was listing namespaces that are used in Qt already. That was to rebut > > your claim that the use of a namespace for a Qt library is new. > > I didn't make any claim that "the use of a namespace for a Qt library is > new". > > Whatever you rebutted was not my claim.
I had the following in mind: On Monday 08 June 2015 01:11:23 Stephen Kelly wrote: > 5) Qt3D namespace > > This is the first time that all classes in a library are in a namespace. > Previously only enums (in various modules) and free functions (in > QtConcurrent) have been put in namespaces. > > In QtConcurrent, the module name also appears in the header file, but that > is not followed by Qt3D libraries. > > Given that Qt has never put classes in a namespace like this, is there > something to be consistent about here? Sorry if should I have replied to the wrong mail. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <[email protected]> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - The Qt Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
