Sean Harmer wrote: > On Thursday 11 June 2015 19:42:55 Stephen Kelly wrote: >> Marc Mutz wrote: >> > On Thursday 11 June 2015 13:09:39 Stephen Kelly wrote: >> >> I didn't make any claim that "the use of a namespace for a Qt library >> >> is new". >> >> >> >> Whatever you rebutted was not my claim. >> >> So, you believe there is no use in pursuing any of the questions I asked >> here: >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.qt.devel/21775/focus=21865 >> >> Fair enough. That appears to be the mailing list consensus. >> >> Maybe the wiki page for new modules should recommend coin flips to answer >> those questions :). > > I said I'm happy to discuss. I'm just waiting for some more opinions, > please don't take that as me trying to shut the discussion down. :)
Cool. Let's wait and see. Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
