On 19/06/15 18:26, "[email protected] on behalf of Gunnar Roth" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
> >Hi Björn, >i am really glad this discussion will come to an end ;-), it already took >considerable time, internally and externally. >> Am 19.06.2015 um 17:51 schrieb Björn Breitmeyer <[email protected]>: >> >> Hi Gunnar, >> >> sadly i have to agree. I finally had the time to setup a Visual Studio 2013 >> with the recent Platform Builder and sadly the generated SDK's still have >> the Compiler Version 17.xx and says Visual Studio 2012. So the link indeed >> gets us to wrong assumptions. It is a bit sad since there is a working arm >> compiler as you said. >> > >Yes there is, and as i wrote it can be used to compile c99 code and create a >working executable by just setting /subsystem to windowsce in the linker step. >This is because wec2013 and winrt both use thumb2 and the arm eabi 2. So the >problem is the missing std c++ library for wec2013 and this v18.00 compiler >and that it is not supported by MS. > > >> But we can't force our users to try unsupported crude workarounds. So i hope >> we can find a consenus on having Visual Studio 2012 as a baseline. As >> otherwise we would drop Embedded Compact 2013 support directly after >> introducing it. >That would make me and the company really sad > > >I would appreciate a clear answer ( or better commitment) from the Qt Company >to continue supporting wec2013 beyond qt 5.6. There was never an intention to remove it after 5.6. But I was hoping that we could be using VC++ 2013 (and support wec2013 with it). Looks like that is unfortunately not the case. That implies that our new compiler baseline will stay with 2012 for some time :/ Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
