On 15/10/15 08:29, "Marc Mutz" <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote: >On Thursday 15 October 2015 06:03:40 Thiago Macieira wrote: >> We'll have to have a long discussion on what to name the class, >>though... >> QTimeExtended? QExtendedTime? QTimeV2? QMicroTime? QTimeSpan? > >std::chrono::{duration,time_point,clock}. In Qt6, a compat-only QTime >will be >a thin wrapper around std::chrono::nanoseconds, if we don't kill it off >there >and then.
A thin wrapper is certainly possible. Killing it off completely is out of the question with QTime being a class that has been in Qt since Qt 1 times and is being used a lot by our users. Cheers, Lars > >Or have I misunderstood the sentiment surrounding QOptional, QArrayView >and >QFunction? > >Thanks, >Marc > >-- >Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer >KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company >Tel: +49-30-521325470 >KDAB - The Qt Experts >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >Development@qt-project.org >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development