+1 for naming QTimeSpan with support for arithmetic operators.

On Thursday 15 October 2015 02:09:07 Aleix Pol wrote:
> Maybe you could look into forking QTime with the microseconds changes?
> That could be reasonable even within Qt.

Indeed, that would.

We'll have to have a long discussion on what to name the class, though...
QTimeExtended? QExtendedTime? QTimeV2? QMicroTime? QTimeSpan?

If you're going to do this, you'll need a 64-bit integer anyway, so you may as 
well provide nanosecond support.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
This email and any files transmitted with it from The Charles Machine Works, 
Inc. are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or 
entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this email in error 
please notify the sender. Our company accepts no liability for the contents of 
this email, or for the consequences of any actions taken on the basis of the 
information provided, unless that information is subsequently confirmed in 
writing. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are 
solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the 
company. Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for 
the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused 
by any virus transmitted by this email.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to