Am 09.12.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Marc Mutz:
Arguments in favour:
- it's the C++ way of writing the null pointer constant these days
- we need to use it in headers, anyway, to allow people to use -Wzero-as...,
and it makes no sense to have two sets of rules for headers and impl
- it can disambiguate code and prevent accidents
- in some situations, it makes code easier to understand (: m_foo(nullptr)).
Arguments against:
- it's uglier than "0", and more to type
Have we discussed "{}" instead of "nullptr", or "0" already?
Ciao,
Mathias
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
