On Wednesday 09 December 2015 17:41:26 Matthew Woehlke wrote:
> On 2015-12-09 17:29, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On Wednesday 09 December 2015 22:47:51 Marc Mutz wrote:
> > 
> > I'd like to propose this:
> >  [...]
> >  c) which means no -Werror=zero-as-nullptr outside of headersclean
> 
> I just want to say that I think this is fair. The key phrase there is
> "outside of". -Wzero-as-nullptr is controversial and I can totally
> understand and accept the Qt project not wanting to go there. It's the
> *public* headers that (potentially) spill over into preventing other
> projects that use Qt from choosing to use -W[error=]zero-as-nullptr
> themselves. So only enforcing it there is more than sufficient to
> satisfy external consumers of Qt.

For headersclean, we can already enable for 5.6.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to