On 2015-12-26 20:17, Kevin Kofler wrote: > And what is hard to parse for humans? The "char* p,q" "issue"? That's a > formatting bug then, this ought to be written "char *p, q", which makes it > very clear what is going on.
That's... debatable. Personally, I dislike combining names and type information. And it doesn't always work out so nicely. What, for example, is the type of 'q' here?: char const* const *p, q; Explicit pointer/reference types and multiple declarations should simply not appear in the same statement¹. Period. -- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
