Den 29-12-2015 kl. 18:47 skrev Matthew Woehlke:
On 2015-12-26 20:17, Kevin Kofler wrote:
And what is hard to parse for humans? The "char* p,q" "issue"? That's a
formatting bug then, this ought to be written "char *p, q", which makes it
very clear what is going on.
That's... debatable. Personally, I dislike combining names and type
information. And it doesn't always work out so nicely. What, for
example, is the type of 'q' here?:
char const* const *p, q;
Explicit pointer/reference types and multiple declarations should simply
not appear in the same statement¹. Period.
This is getting quite off-topic, even for this thread.
Bo Thorsen,
Director, Viking Software.
--
Viking Software
Qt and C++ developers for hire
http://www.vikingsoft.eu
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
