> Joseph Crowell <[email protected]> kirjoitti 20.2.2016 kello 9.09:
> 
> What about VS 2013?
> 

Based on our understanding it offers quite decent C++11 support and should stay 
supported.

Yours,

Tuukka


>> On 20/02/2016 7:01 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Now that 5.7 is branched, I'd like to propose that we update our list of 
>> supported compilers and platforms for Qt 5.8. After some discussions with 
>> different people, here's an initial proposal from my side:
>> 
>> * We drop support for VS2012. This implicitly drops support for WEC2013. 
>> Reason is that the compiler is still having rather large problems with it's 
>> C++11 support. I hope that we could serve the WEC market rather well with 
>> 5.6 and 5.7 for the years to come. In the end, the benefit we get with 
>> dropping the compiler will hopefully outweigh the cost (loosing WEC) by a 
>> good margin.
>> 
>> * We drop support for Vista. Vista has a market share that is below 2%, and 
>> again we have 5.6 to cover that platform for the next 3 years.
>> 
>> * We should upgrade MingW to a newer version, possibly based on gcc 5.2
>> 
>> * No changes for Windows Phone, we continue to support 8.1 and 10.
>> 
>> * We require the latest Xcode toolchain and OS X on the Mac for compiling 
>> (see separate mailing list thread). We support deployment to OS X 10.9 and 
>> later (dropping 10.8)
>> 
>> * On iOS, we also require the latest Xcode toolchain for compiling. We 
>> continue with iOS 7 as the minimum supported version for deployment.
>> 
>> * Minimum version for Android is probably going to stay with 4.1 (as with 
>> 5.7). We would like to add a 64 bit build to the CI
>> 
>> * We continue to support QNX 6.6
>> 
>> * On Linux, we will investigate upgrading our packaging machine from RHEL 
>> 6.6 to RHEL 7. We should also try to update our Ubuntu CI machines to 16.04 
>> once it's released.
>> 
>> 
>> Let me know if you see larger problems with these changes.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Lars
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to