On 21/02/16 19:01, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>On domingo, 21 de fevereiro de 2016 07:01:57 PST Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> > Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> kirjoitti 21.2.2016 kello >7.15: >> >> On sábado, 20 de fevereiro de 2016 22:09:20 PST Allan Sandfeld Jensen >> >> wrote: Well, feature-complete'ish. I recently found out we need clang >> >> 3.5 to use deleted constructors in Chromium. Clang 3.4 has a bug which >> >> will cause it to claim deleted methods causes ambiguity with >> >> non-deleted methods. So if we opt for gcc 4.8, I would suggest demanding >> >> clang 3.5 as well. >> > >> > That would drop FreeBSD 10.2, which is the current stable release today. >> >> According to their release plans both 10.3 and 11.0 should be out well >> before Qt 5.8. > >10.3 won 't update the compiler. 11.0 will. > >But let's keep Clang 3.4 as required, it's only 3 releases (currently) old. >We're supporting GCC 4.7, which is also 3 releases old. That's probably ok for Qt 5.8, let's reevaluate gcc 4.7 and clang 3.4 for Qt 5.9. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
