On Montag, 30. Mai 2016 11:16:00 CEST Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:19:38AM +0200, Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Sunday 29 May 2016 18:05:07 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > I've just pushed a feature[1] to moc that makes it process multiple > > > headers > > > at the same time, producing only one output file > > > > Separate compilation is not how I would recommend to use moc-generated > > files. I'd recommend to always include the moc file in the corresponding > > cpp file. > > i agree that the idea to bulk-compile mocs is somewhat backwards.
Backwards to what? It's easy to do and save compilation time. [...] > the next idea would be implementing moc inside the compiler itself, > which is possible with at least clang and gcc nowadays. > > the last idea is doing away with moc entirely, at the cost of somewhat > uglier macros, and actually working c++11/14 support in the compiler. > > "incidentally", olivier has more-or-less working solutions based on the > latter two ideas. Which impose many more requirements on the compilers. And we support many more compiler in Qt. -- Olivier Woboq - Qt services and support - https://woboq.com - https://code.woboq.org _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
