On terça-feira, 31 de maio de 2016 11:24:14 BRT Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > This would even preserve Q_PRIVATE_SLOT, leading to less churn
> > > (unless that transition is desireable for other reasons than
> > > "doesn't work with moc_combine").
> >
> > It's desireable in most cases, but it's not always easy.
> 
> can you get any more cryptic?

It's desireable to do that transition (remove Q_PRIVATE_SLOT) but it's not 
always easy.

See I87e17314d8b24ae983b1fffd1453881278670a83 when I push it later today to 
get rid of the last Q_PRIVATE_SLOT in QtDBus.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to