On 27 June 2016 at 17:28, Uwe Rathmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:39:42 +0000, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > > We have mostly stopped working on QtQuick Controls 1, because the > > implementation of Controls 2 is much more performant ... > > Controls 2 are for "embedded" - what at least means to me: not being for > desktop applications. > > > It was achieved by implementing behavior in C++ ... > > ... and by dropping desktop specific features. > > But does your statement imply, that Qt development has mostly given up QML > as a technology for the desktop ? > > If true, was it done because of: > > a) seeing Controls 1 as complete and satisfying > b) something is wrong with the implementation of Controls 1 > c) the overhead of QML is too big for such large projects > d) nobody is interested in the desktop at all > > And what is recommended for us users: better starting off with widgets > for new desktop applications ? > > Uwe
Hi, I suggest reading the comments section of https://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/06/10/qt-quick-controls-2-0-a-new-beginning/ for detailed comments about Desktop support. Regards, Sze-Howe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
