Please let's try not go off topic. This post is for improving and collecting ideas for improving the QtQuick event handling. I would be more interested in knowing the struggle you had dealing with it and discussing the idea i've proposed
F. 2016-06-27 11:28 GMT+02:00 Uwe Rathmann <[email protected]>: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:39:42 +0000, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > > We have mostly stopped working on QtQuick Controls 1, because the > > implementation of Controls 2 is much more performant ... > > Controls 2 are for "embedded" - what at least means to me: not being for > desktop applications. > > > It was achieved by implementing behavior in C++ ... > > ... and by dropping desktop specific features. > > But does your statement imply, that Qt development has mostly given up QML > as a technology for the desktop ? > > If true, was it done because of: > > a) seeing Controls 1 as complete and satisfying > b) something is wrong with the implementation of Controls 1 > c) the overhead of QML is too big for such large projects > d) nobody is interested in the desktop at all > > And what is recommended for us users: better starting off with widgets > for new desktop applications ? > > Uwe > > > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > -- Filippo Cucchetto
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
