On 6 September 2016 at 16:20, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > Em terça-feira, 6 de setembro de 2016, às 13:40:40 PDT, Ch'Gans escreveu: >> On 6 September 2016 at 01:52, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: >> > 05.09.2016, 16:38, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kof...@chello.at>: >> >> Andrew Knight wrote: >> >>> * Quick survey: which build system do you use (raise of hands by ~40 >> >>> people) >> >>> - CMake ~70% >> >>> - qmake ~20% >> >>> - Qbs ~10% >> >> >> >> That basically says it all. :-) >> >> Yes, that basically says it all: 90% of people were certainly unaware >> or unfamiliar with Qbs! ;) > > Which is, in itself, an argument: why learn yet another buildsystem?
Good question, maybe because it's more powerful, it fits better your needs, it is more fun, it uses new concepts, ... Or just out of curiosity! Why learn yet another programming language? If I followed this reasoning, I would still be writing my programs in Motorola assembler... Luckily, I've learned other languages like C, C++, Python, Lua, JS, Qml, etc, ... An average software developer knows about, says 10 to 20 programming languages, maybe even more depending on the definition of "language". Why should he/she knows just one build system? Chris > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
