On Monday 19 September 2016 23:27:52 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Montag, 19. September 2016 18:48:10 CEST Marc Mutz wrote: > > On Monday 19 September 2016 18:20:48 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > Should we do fuzzy comparisns in QVariant? > > > > If you talk about op==, then using fuzzy compare is a definite no-no, > > because it makes it impossible to define a hash function. > > We really cannot have a qHash for QVariant anyway, because that would imply > that ALL QVariant can be hashed, and compared. Which is not the case. Most > custom types don't even register comparator function. > So I don't think that's an argument.
We have a op== on QVariant, thus we must be able to have a qHash, but indeed, as I said, this is an extensive amount of work, as if introducing comparator functions from scratch. Thanks, Marc -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company Tel: +49-30-521325470 KDAB - Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
