Really? Shouldn't be better to just announce a proposal on the mailing list and then shift the discussion and feedbacks on the codereview?
2016-09-20 18:46 GMT+02:00 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>: > On terça-feira, 20 de setembro de 2016 08:54:05 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: >> And it formalizes the way we can discuss and comment on things, as QUIPs >> would be reviewed in codereview, then approved there. I believe it’ll lead >> to a better workflow and better decision making in the project than >> discussions on the mailing list that often end somewhat inconclusive. > > Discussions on content still happen on the mailing list for maximum > reachability. The discussion on codereview is just the editorial workflow. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Filippo Cucchetto _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development