> On Nov 29, 2016, at 11:28 PM, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2016 07:15:31 PST Alexander Blasche wrote: >> The big problem is that there are still plenty of 32bit users because they >> truly use 32bit platforms or 3rdparty software forces them to do so. Moving >> to 64 bit excludes users without alternatives. 32 bit does not exclude. >> Yes, I know this is a chicken and egg problem but right now we have reduced >> the 32bit package count for 5.9 already. Let's not rush too much. > > Then let's not drop the 32-bit mingw. But we should add the 64-bit one, and > if > possible to 5.8 too. > >> There are already 11 windows binary types/packages in the current setup and >> that's too many. I see some opportunity when 2013 drops out in the future. > > How are there 11? There are currently 3 compilers and 2 architectures for > desktop Windows, so the maximum number possible is 6.
I think you're forgetting WinRT? Also 2015 x86+x86_64+armv7 + 2013 x86 + armv7(phone), making 11. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Jake Petroules - jake.petrou...@qt.io The Qt Company - Silicon Valley Qbs build tool evangelist - qbs.io _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
