Hi all, I finally managed to do testing how big combined windows installer would be. I was a bit surprised that it is only ~3.3 GB, which is still smaller than combined mac-android-ios installer ;) Ok, this is done from 5.8 packages & binaries so situation might be a bit different in 5.9 where we will have some new binaries to be done. But in the other hand we will/should drop some so I think the size of combined one should be still manageable.
So I propose we will offer following set of offline installers from Qt 5.9 -> - For linux we will have 3 installers (instead of existing 5): * qt-enterprise-linux-x64-android (already delivering this) * qt-opensource-linux-x64-android (already delivering this) ** Desktop gcc 64-bit ** Android x86 ** Android armv7 * qt-enterprise-linux-x64-qnx (already delivering this) ** Desktop gcc 64-bit ** Qnx x86 ** Qnx armv7 ** NOTE: I don't think we can offer QNX 7 binaries yet so QNX 6 binaries will be offered like 5.8.0 - For mac we will have 2 installers (instead of existing 6): * qt-enterprise-mac-x64-android-ios (already delivering this) * qt-opensource-mac-x64-android-ios (already delivering this) ** Desktop clang 64-bit ** Android x86 ** Android armv7 ** iOS - For windows we will have 3 installers (instead of existing 17): * qt-enterprise-windows-x86 (new) * qt-opensource-windows-x86 (new) ** Desktop MSVC 2013 x64 ** Desktop MSVC 2015 x86 ** Desktop MSVC 2015 x64 ** Desktop MSVC 2017 x64 ** Desktop MinGW 5.3 x86 ** UWP MSVC 2015 x86 ** UWP MSVC 2015 x64 ** UWP MSVC 2015 armv7 ** UWP MSVC 2017 x86 ** UWP MSVC 2017 x64 ** UWP MSVC 2017 armv7 ** Android x86 ** Android armv7 * qt-enterprise-linux-x64-qnx (already delivering this) ** Desktop MinGW 5.3 x86 ** Qnx x86 ** Qnx armv7 ** NOTE: I don't think we can offer QNX 7 binaries yet so QNX 6 binaries will be offered like 5.8.0 br, Jani ________________________________________ From: Development <development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 5:05 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 On quarta-feira, 30 de novembro de 2016 07:53:40 PST Jake Petroules wrote: > How about we have one package per host platform which includes all possible > hosts and targets compatible with it? Then we have 3 packages, ever. Or, at least, one binary per platform + compiler combination. So that's 1 Linux package, 1 macOS package, 3 Windows packages today, with a 4th Windows (MSVC 2017) coming for 5.9. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development