Back on the 7th of November 2016 I announced: > With the 5.8.0 release now close at hand, I've updated the API reviews:
I've now updated these for the actual 5.8.0 branch (fetched this morning): https://codereview.qt-project.org/170634 - qtbase https://codereview.qt-project.org/170635 - qtdeclarative https://codereview.qt-project.org/170636 - qtactiveqt https://codereview.qt-project.org/170637 - qtmultimedia https://codereview.qt-project.org/170640 - qtconnectivity https://codereview.qt-project.org/170641 - qtwayland https://codereview.qt-project.org/170642 - qt3d https://codereview.qt-project.org/170643 - qtserialbus https://codereview.qt-project.org/170644 - qtserialport https://codereview.qt-project.org/170645 - qtandroidextras https://codereview.qt-project.org/170646 - qtwebsockets https://codereview.qt-project.org/170647 - qtwebengine https://codereview.qt-project.org/170648 - qtcanvas3d https://codereview.qt-project.org/170649 - qtcharts https://codereview.qt-project.org/170650 - qtdatavis3d https://codereview.qt-project.org/170652 - qtscxml https://codereview.qt-project.org/176059 - qtquickcontrols2 > Note that, although Gerrit thinks of these as proposals to change 5.8, > they are actually commits based on tag v5.7.0 showing what's changed in 5.8.0's > API, with lots of boring bits filtered out. As before, it would be nice if some of these did in fact get reviewed - and J-P Nurmi gets the prize for having done that before I even sent this - indeed, within a minute of the new push :-) Gerrit should make it easy to compare the new patch set to the previous, which should make review easy - if your module hasn't changed too drastically since the previous review in early November ... Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
