Marc Mutz wrote: > Hi, > > I just filed https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79433 > complaining that __has_include returns true for headers which then, when > included, #error out about the wrong C++ standard used.
In my opinion, the problem is sd-6 defining feature macros in the header that contains the implementation, instead of in a single header. There are many reasons not to do that, but the opinion of the chair is bonkers and no one else has an opinion: https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00018.html https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00162.html Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
