On quinta-feira, 9 de fevereiro de 2017 01:11:18 PST Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Il 08/02/2017 23:43, Thiago Macieira ha scritto: > > I'd rather not and just suppress functionality until the compiler gets > > their act together. Our users should file bugs with their vendors instead > > to pressure them to change their way. > > They did and the result was a WONTFIX: > > https://connect.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/feedback/details/763051/a-value > > -of-predefined-macro-cplusplus-is-still-199711l > My 2 c,
That wasn't WONTFIX. That was "we'll fix it when we get the rest of C++11 done". I meant the SD-6 predefined macros: we want the compiler vendors to support them. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
