On 18 March 2017 at 21:04, Kevin Kofler <[email protected]> wrote: > Thiago Macieira wrote: >> A lot. I don't think we can have Qt 6 without a class called "QList". But >> we can make it be the same as QVector, which is what we want people to >> use. > > So the user code will at least compile (unlike with Marc Mutz's approach), > but algorithms that previously completed in O(n) will now complete only in > O(mn) (and of course this multiplies on: if you were inserting into a QList > in a loop, it goes from O(n²) to O(mn²)), which is kinda ironic for a change > designed to "improve performance".
It might be worth keeping this in mind: https://isocpp.org/blog/2014/06/stroustrup-lists _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
