On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 09:45:07AM +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > Il 27/03/2017 09:22, Martin Smith ha scritto: > > vector<point> is an ordered collection of points, but a QVector can > > contain anything; QVector<void*> can even contain unlike things, which > > is truly a tuple. So the problem here is the name QVector. The basic > > collection should be called QTuple or QArray, and QVector should mean > > QTuple<QPoint>. > > As Marc already told you, the problem here is that there's already 20+ > years of experience in the C++ community with the name "vector" > indicating a very precise thing (which has nothing to do with geometry > or linear spaces).
Since when is $SOME_COMMUNITY_WE_ARE_INTERESTED_IN is using $FEATURE since $ETERNITY a valid argument in this thread here? Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
