Il 27/03/2017 21:03, André Pönitz ha scritto: >>> vector<point> is an ordered collection of points, but a QVector can >>> contain anything; QVector<void*> can even contain unlike things, which >>> is truly a tuple. So the problem here is the name QVector. The basic >>> collection should be called QTuple or QArray, and QVector should mean >>> QTuple<QPoint>. >> As Marc already told you, the problem here is that there's already 20+ >> years of experience in the C++ community with the name "vector" >> indicating a very precise thing (which has nothing to do with geometry >> or linear spaces). > Since when is $SOME_COMMUNITY_WE_ARE_INTERESTED_IN is using $FEATURE > since $ETERNITY a valid argument in this thread here?
When people started doing claims about "how things should be named (and why)" (which, yes, itself was an unnecessary thread derailment. But I didn't start *that*.) Cheers, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908 KDAB - Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
