On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:02:32PM +0000, Morten Sørvig wrote: > On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:37, Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenha...@qt.io> wrote: > > also, a plan for splitting up qtbase wouldn't be entirely off the > > mark. untangling tests and examples would be the major effort here. > > No, we should follow Google and Facebook’s lead: large monolithic > repos (as large as the infrastructure can handle), which can be > updated atomically. > that's kinda the point: the infrastructure (and tooling) can't handle it, at multiple levels. for the atomicity, see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-868 .
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
