05.04.2017, 17:46, "Oswald Buddenhagen" <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:02:32PM +0000, Morten Sørvig wrote: >> On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:37, Oswald Buddenhagen <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > also, a plan for splitting up qtbase wouldn't be entirely off the >> > mark. untangling tests and examples would be the major effort here. >> >> No, we should follow Google and Facebook’s lead: large monolithic >> repos (as large as the infrastructure can handle), which can be >> updated atomically. > > that's kinda the point: the infrastructure (and tooling) can't handle > it, at multiple levels. > for the atomicity, see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-868 .
Right now it requires a lot of time and patience to get any patch integrated into qt5.git. If everything is in the same repo, the same will apply to patches for other modules :/ > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
