On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 13:39:52 -03 Marc Mutz wrote: > On 2017-04-25 16:34, Lars Knoll wrote: > [...] > > > But I agree with Thiago, that we should have this written down in a > > QUIP, ideally with a list of the classes we consider ok to use in our > > APIs. > > [...] > > I'd make the QUIP define the updated BC guarantee. The list of std types > available for use in Qt APIs should be in QtBase Git, though, to be > versioned on a per-branch basis.
Why does it need to be versioned on a per-branch basis? Because of when we deprecate older compilers, we can update the list? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
