On 2017-04-25 19:41, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 13:39:52 -03 Marc Mutz wrote:
On 2017-04-25 16:34, Lars Knoll wrote:
[...]

> But I agree with Thiago, that we should have this written down in a
> QUIP, ideally with a list of the classes we consider ok to use in our
> APIs.

[...]

I'd make the QUIP define the updated BC guarantee. The list of std types
available for use in Qt APIs should be in QtBase Git, though, to be
versioned on a per-branch basis.

Why does it need to be versioned on a per-branch basis? Because of when we
deprecate older compilers, we can update the list?

Correct.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to