On 2017-05-04 14:53, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet
escreveu:
Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes,
then
which configuration it will be replaced?
I don't think we need to. The macOS builds should be sufficient for
almost
everything intrinsic to Clang. Those of us who test it on Linux will
submit
fixes as needed.
We've introduced bugs in the past that would have been caught
immediately by clang + Werror if it had been in the CI.
clang has warnings that gcc doesn't have. Apple Clang is based on older
clang (which one?), so doesn't have all the nice warnings.
I don't know the cost of adding it to the CI, so I won't comment on the
cost/benefit relation.
Regards,
--
Sérgio Martins | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
Tel: Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322)
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
