On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > > We are arguing whether the change makes the code uglier and is worth that > ugliness. I'm not sold on that. Leave those const behind until Qt 6, unless > you can show that engaging the move constructor is important.
What about defining a (private) macro centrally and using it in those places, as it has been proposed? -- Giuseppe D'Angelo _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
