On Tuesday, 23 May 2017 15:35:50 PDT Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:56 PM, Thiago Macieira > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > We are arguing whether the change makes the code uglier and is worth that > > ugliness. I'm not sold on that. Leave those const behind until Qt 6, > > unless > > you can show that engaging the move constructor is important. > > What about defining a (private) macro centrally and using it in those > places, as it has been proposed?
Still ugly. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
