I would suggest you to make your language feature complete before making any benchmark. For your information, lambda and variable capture cannot be discussed, it is absolutely needed.
in my opinion, you totally under estimate the design of a language, please read on Stroustrup / c++ etc. as a first language design attempt, I would personnaly implement an existing language that would fit the purpose. (kotlin, pascal?, etc) as a scripting language, it will be very hard to propose anything else than javascript, you can try of course but without a backing company, there is very little chance to succeed. Best regards, Sylvain Le dim. 30 juil. 2017 à 19:23, Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> a écrit : > On 07/21/2017 12:22 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > I am now using C++14 standards, the error reporting is all compile-time > > now and I get a test that is 3.5 faster than Node.JS! You can see it by > > yourselves here: > > https://github.com/philippeb8/root_ptr/tree/bb++/bbpp2cpp > > I just tried it on Windows 8.1 and the standard deviation is even > greater: 4.2x faster on Windows when it is 3.5x faster on Linux (2.40 > GHz). This must be because Visual C++ generates slightly better code > than G++. > > I'll generate documentation for your convenience soon. > > > -Phil > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
