On Friday, 1 September 2017 05:06:23 PDT Maurice Kalinowski wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Most of you might have noticed the IoT related discussion happening on this > mailing list. If not, check here in the archive: > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2017-August/030723.html > > One of the items mentioned has been CoAP and that it would make a great > addition to Qt. Interestingly, there has been discussions between the Qt > Company and Witekio about exactly this topic. Thanks to the people at > Witekio these resulted in actual code already available to get reviewed. To > avoid any duplicate effort and have everyone participating as early as > possible a new repository is needed.
Hi Maurice That's great. As you may have seen from my emails, I am a great supporter of CoAP and I'm really pleased that The Qt Company and others also think it's worth having in Qt. > Name of the project: Qt CoAP > > Responsible person: > Cedric Amarger > Gerrit user/email: Cedric Amarger <[email protected]> > Desired repository name: qtcoap > > For now, I will leave any technical detail to Cedric. I don't think we can discuss the format of such an implementation until we have DTLS support. For one thing, it isn't clear to me that we'll have a QDtlsSocket class in the first place, or whether it'll be a simple non- QIODevice wrapper on top of QUdpSocket. I'm also wondering if we shouldn't have a bigger repo for IoT-related things, instead of creating a small one for each thing. Does it make sense to start thinking of "qtiot" ? Then we could merge qtopcua in it and could also add MQTT, DDS, DPS support and others. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
