On Monday, September 4, 2017 9:14:37 AM CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Saturday, 2 September 2017 16:54:03 -03 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: > > On piątek, 1 września 2017 08:38:19 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote: > > > I'm also wondering if we shouldn't have a bigger repo for IoT-related > > > things, instead of creating a small one for each thing. > > > > Currently, from CI and releasing perspective heaving dozen of small repos > > is easier and faster. All these modules are quite distinct, so joining > > them would not give any adventage to our users nor us apart of a good > > feeling of grouping things together. > > Except if one depends on the other. In which case we can't start adding > features until qt5 integrates and that usually takes about two weeks happen. > > Anyway, there aren't any dependencies expected so far (aside from DTLS, > which should be in QtNetwork).
True, but we can re-evaluate if it is not working, modularization is harder in general as it requires some code changes. Regarding the "two weeks" delay, it is mostly a social problem, as we can not agree on how often qt5 submodule update should happen, the status quo is kept and it happens randomly and on a request. Jędrek _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
