On quarta-feira, 13 de setembro de 2017 01:54:12 PDT Edward Welbourne wrote:
>> [...] Should Q_DECL_CONST_FUNCTION
>> changes be ignored ? Q_NORETURN ? They currently aren't.
Thiago Macieira (13 September 2017 15:51)
> Those two are optimisations and could safely be ignored, but they
> don't happen often enough for you to have to worry. The Q_NORETURN
> changes you're seeing are a result of having to move the macro to a
> different place in the line and that's only going to happen once
> (now).
OK, but I infer there's no harm in including them in the list of tokens
the script already ignores - explicit, Q_ALWAYS_INLINE, Q_DECL_NOTHROW
before the new additions. How about Q_REQUIRED_RESULT ?
Eddy.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
