> -----Original Message----- > From: Edward Welbourne > Sent: tiistai 17. huhtikuuta 2018 12.09 > To: Jani Heikkinen <[email protected]>; Alex Blasche > <[email protected]> > Cc: Qt development mailing list <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.12 schedule proposal & proposal for release > process change > > To paraphrase and possibly mangle Jani's plan (without opinion on whether I > like it; this is about making sure I understand the plan): > > Summary: > * Make snapshots and FF, not release, the time-based part of our process. > > Details: > * Make snap-shots regularly, merely changing their naming as we move > through the phases below. > * Branch, release first alpha and start API review at FF. Ever step > after this takes as long as it does; and we try to keep each short. > * Name snap-shots alpha n; all API changes must be notified to the > review for their module, prompting an update to that review. > * When API review is complete and all features are completely > implemented, transition to beta. Only bug-fixes come in after this. > * Name snap-shots beta n after this; ask folk to test beta 1 and report > bugs; triage bugs, fix blockers. > * When the blocker list is empty, transition to RC. If we can't find > any "brown paper bag" issues, ship it; otherwise, fix, rinse and > repeat. > > Jani: how far have I mangled your intent in expressing it thus ? > > Eddy.
This is exactly what I meant. br, Jani _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
